LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed

LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed

Citation Author(s):
Ngombo
Armando
ESPU / Universidade Kimpa Vita
Ngombo
Armando
DEI/CISUC/University of Combra
Submitted by:
Ngombo Armando
Last updated:
Fri, 06/26/2020 - 08:28
DOI:
10.21227/n4ye-0183
Data Format:
License:
Dataset Views:
65
Rating:
0
0 ratings - Please login to submit your rating.
Share / Embed Cite
Abstract: 

We took advantage of the prototype to compare the performances of an LwM2M device management protocol implementation and FIWARE’s Ultralight 2.0. In addition to demonstrating the viability of the proposed approach, the obtained results point to mixed advantages/disadvantages of one protocol over the other.

Instructions: 

The dataset comprises a .xlsx file, where we put the registerer downtimes for the LwM2M clients in both mobile and stationary scenarios. The dataset also has two folders, namely .../mob and /statio for mobile and stationary scenarios, respectively. Each of these folders contains .cap documents and the corresponding .csv formats. .cap files are registries of the sensor data from the clients towards the server.

Dataset Files

You must be an IEEE Dataport Subscriber to access these files. Login or subscribe now. Sign up to be a Beta Tester and receive a coupon code for a free subscription to IEEE DataPort!

Thank you for rating this dataset!

Please share additional details of your rating with the IEEE DataPort community by adding a comment.

Embed this dataset on another website

Copy and paste the HTML code below to embed your dataset:

Share via email or social media

Click the buttons below:

facebooktwittermailshare
[1] Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando, "LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed", IEEE Dataport, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183. Accessed: Jul. 08, 2020.
@data{n4ye-0183-20,
doi = {10.21227/n4ye-0183},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183},
author = {Ngombo Armando; Ngombo Armando },
publisher = {IEEE Dataport},
title = {LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed},
year = {2020} }
TY - DATA
T1 - LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed
AU - Ngombo Armando; Ngombo Armando
PY - 2020
PB - IEEE Dataport
UR - 10.21227/n4ye-0183
ER -
Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando. (2020). LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed. IEEE Dataport. http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183
Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando, 2020. LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183.
Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando. (2020). "LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed." Web.
1. Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando. LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed [Internet]. IEEE Dataport; 2020. Available from : http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183
Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando. "LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed." doi: 10.21227/n4ye-0183