We compared the performances of an LwM2M device management protocol implementation and FIWARE’s Ultralight 2.0. In addition to demonstrating the viability of the proposed approach, the obtained results point to mixed advantages/disadvantages of one protocol over the other.

DOI Link: 
10.21227/n4ye-0183
Read more

Dataset Files

You must be an IEEE Dataport Subscriber to access these files. Subscribe now or login.

Documentation: 
AttachmentSize
File FIWARE and Configurations279.22 KB
[1] Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando, "LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed", IEEE Dataport, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183. Accessed: Mar. 22, 2025.
@data{n4ye-0183-20,
doi = {10.21227/n4ye-0183},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183},
author = {Ngombo Armando; Ngombo Armando },
publisher = {IEEE Dataport},
title = {LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed},
year = {2020} }
TY - DATA
T1 - LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed
AU - Ngombo Armando; Ngombo Armando
PY - 2020
PB - IEEE Dataport
UR - 10.21227/n4ye-0183
ER -
Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando. (2020). LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed. IEEE Dataport. http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183
Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando, 2020. LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183.
Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando. (2020). "LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed." Web.
1. Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando. LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed [Internet]. IEEE Dataport; 2020. Available from : http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/n4ye-0183
Ngombo Armando, Ngombo Armando. "LwM2M 1.0 Versus Ultralight 2.0 Services in FIWARE: A testbed." doi: 10.21227/n4ye-0183