Skip to main content

Datasets

Standard Dataset

Effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on rehabilitation patients with spinal cord injury

Citation Author(s):
Huang Gang
Lin Bin-Lai
Hu Jian-Hui
Zhang Wen-Ya
Qiu Fu-Hua
Zhang Zhi-Liang
Fan Hong
Lu Min
Li Jiang-Bo
Submitted by:
Huang Gang
Last updated:
DOI:
10.21227/zw36-y940
Data Format:
No Ratings Yet

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the differences between the combination of

rehabilitation with acceptance commitment therapy (ACT) and rehabilitation therapy

alone in the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: The newly admitted patients

with spinal cord injury whose PTSD score higher than 38 points were randomly

divided into treatment group and control group.Participants: A total of 60 SCI patients

followed setting were divided into two groups,each one had 30 patients.

Interventions: One group underwent ACT and rehabilitation treatment, while the

other group only underwent the rehabilitation treatment. Post-traumatic stress

disorder (PTSD) and functional independence measure (FIM) scales were used for

evaluation. Main outcome measures: Changes in scores were compared between the

two groups before and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Results: The total PTSD

score in SCI patients who were treated with ACT was significantly different before and

after treatment (P<0.05). Total FIM scores were also significantly different before and

after treatment (P<0.05). The FIM score in the treatment group was significantly

higher than that in the control group after 2 and 3 months of treatment (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of rehabilitation therapy and ACT could immediately

reduce stress levels and significantly improve impaired function, lifelong self-care

ability, and the effect of rehabilitation therapy. 

Instructions:

Figure A and B:

A:▲:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the treatment group within before and after 1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P<0.01).▼:Comparison of total PTSD scores between treatment group and control group(P<0.01).■:Look at the control group, there was no significant difference between before treatment and 1 month after treatment(P>0.05), but there was significant difference in the 2 months after treatment(P<0.05), and the difference was more significant in the 3 months after treatment(P<0.01).

B: ▲:Comparison of the total FIM scores of the treatment group before and after 1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P<0.01).▼:Comparison of total FIM scores between treatment group and control group(P<0.01).■:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the control group before and after treatment in 1, 2 and 3 months(P<0.01).

Data expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM)

 

Figure C

 The modified Barthel Index according to FIM scale was correlated with the total score of PTSD, and the data was expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM) * P < 0.05, * * P < 0.01.

 

This research report was studied under the guidance of my master's supervisor Zhu Zhuohong,written under my doctoral supervisor Li Jiangbo after five years of research and observation by our team.We hope that our results can help the patients with spinal cord injury with serious psychological problems to get out of the psychological shadow as soon as possible, return to the family and society, and help other disabled people as much as possible.

Huang Gang Wed, 12/11/2019 - 13:39 Permalink

Considering the privacy of patients, we did not upload the patient's pictures in the article.

Please help keep the uploaded data confidential before publishing.Thank you.

Huang Gang Wed, 12/11/2019 - 13:39 Permalink

Dataset Files

Files have not been uploaded for this dataset