Standards Research Data
File contains "r bibliometrix" library documentation code for R software (source: Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp 959-975, Elsevier/ https://github.com/massimoaria/bibliometrix) for bibligraphy analysis of Urban carrying capacity related researches and Web of Science data records. In total 307 data record of Web of Science database was extracted and cleaned (n=307).
- Categories:
the data sets are based on the original survey data, and Mahalanobis distance and cook's distance have been utilized for the normal distribution, and some items have been reversed for analyses.
- Categories:
Abstract Objective: This study aimed to explore the differences between the combination of rehabilitation with acceptance commitment therapy (ACT) and rehabilitation therapy alone in the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: SCI patients admitted to a hospital were included. Participants: A total of 60 SCI patients were divided into two groups,each one had 30 patients. Interventions: One group underwent ACT and rehabilitation treatment, while the other group only underwent the rehabilitation treatment.
- Categories:
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the differences between the combination of
rehabilitation with acceptance commitment therapy (ACT) and rehabilitation therapy
alone in the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: The newly admitted patients
with spinal cord injury whose PTSD score higher than 38 points were randomly
divided into treatment group and control group.Participants: A total of 60 SCI patients
- Categories:
Figure A and B:
A:▲:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the treatment group within before and after 1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P<0.01).▼:Comparison of total PTSD scores between treatment group and control group(P<0.01).■:Look at the control group, there was no significant difference between before treatment and 1 month after treatment(P>0.05), but there was significant difference in the 2 months after treatment(P<0.05), and the difference was more significant in the 3 months after treatment(P<0.01).
- Categories:
Figure A and B:
A:▲:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the treatment group within before and after 1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P<0.01).▼:Comparison of total PTSD scores between treatment group and control group(P<0.01).■:Look at the control group, there was no significant difference between before treatment and 1 month after treatment(P>0.05), but there was significant difference in the 2 months after treatment(P<0.05), and the difference was more significant in the 3 months after treatment(P<0.01).
- Categories:
Data for online parameter estimation problem of PMSM
- Categories:
Blank
- Categories:
Figure A and B:
A:▲:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the treatment group within before and after 1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P<0.01).▼:Comparison of total PTSD scores between treatment group and control group(P<0.01).■:Look at the control group, there was no significant difference between before treatment and 1 month after treatment(P>0.05), but there was significant difference in the 2 months after treatment(P<0.05), and the difference was more significant in the 3 months after treatment(P<0.01).
- Categories: