DATASET OF PHOTOGRAPHIC FOOD RECORDS

Citation Author(s):
Juan
Fontana
National University of Rio Cuatro
Edward
Sazonov
University of Alabama, Tuscoloosa
Janine
Higgins
University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus
Megan
McCrory
Boston University
Tyson
Marden
University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus
Graham
Thomas
Brown University
Submitted by:
Tyson Marden
Last updated:
Thu, 05/14/2020 - 12:01
DOI:
10.21227/5mjw-jz09
Data Format:
License:
0
0 ratings - Please login to submit your rating.

Abstract 

Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure habitual dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake.

Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: 1) weighed food record; 2) photographic food record; 3) diet diary; and 4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The Study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method.

Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility versus the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4),which was better than that for the diet diary (RC=79.6 (55.5, 103.3)) but not as repeatable as the photographic method (RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)).

Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.

Instructions: 

Each file contains before and after pictures of a meal for each participant.

Documentation

AttachmentSize
File readme.docx12.55 KB