Data for paper "The Sensitivity of ENRZ to Crosstalk - InComparison to NRZ, PAM3, and PAM4_14Jan2022"

The performances of ENRZ (Ensemble NRZ) under
the interferences of crosstalk, in conjunction with NRZ (NonReturn-to-Zero), PAM4 (Pulse Amplitude Modulation of 4-level),
and PAM3 are investigated. One-side and two-side crosstalk scenarios with varying levels of crosstalk are studied. The simulated
eye-diagram obtained with the four signaling techniques under
a range of crosstalk levels are compared and the reasons that
lead to the prominent advantages of ENRZ are analyzed. As
an alternative approach of validating the performances of the
under-study encoding schemes, this research also conducts the
algorithm analysis on the four singling schemes and compares the
results to that previously obtained by the commercial simulation
tool. In addition, the study explores the correct method of
adding crosstalk to the ENRZ or other multi-wire based channels
which is not straightforward due to the neither single-ended
nor differential nature of the multi-wire encoding system. A
new concept of differential (DIFF)-to-single-ended (SE) crosstalk
penalty is formed and applied to facilitate the theoretical analysis.
Different levels of DIFF - SE crosstalk penalty are swept and one
of them is proposed as the recommended crosstalk penalty value
based on the correlation to the simulated results.