facebooktwittermailshare
OPEN ACCESS

Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods

This work aims to implement in Matlab and Simulink the perturb-and-observe (P&O) and incremental conductance Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms that are published in the scientific literature. The main objective is to determine which of these two methods are the most suitable for MPPT control in order to establish an optimal algorithm if is desired undertake analysis of power depending on solar radiation (irradiance) and respectively function of temperature taking into account the modification of change of duty cycle parameter that enter in the MPPT control algorithms of the considered model of photovoltaic (PV) system.

The PV system model used for simulation consists of the PV panel, variant subsystem of irradiance, buck converter and variant subsystem of MPPT controller. Considering the optimal rapport between time of simulation, step change response of buck converter and the maximum power obtained, the best result for P&O and incremental conductance MPPT methods are obtained at the step change of duty cycle deltad=8 ms of MPPT controller.
The incremental conductance algorithm is superior compared with P&O both at power obtained as well as at step recovery of power and variation of temperature.

First are simulated the P&O and incremental conductance algorithms using a step variation of irradiance at ambient temperature and different values of the step change of duty cycle of implemented MPPT algorithms.
Afterwards are given the simulation result for two different irradiance and temperature levels at the optimum step change of duty cycle previously established.
The simulation results are presented in parallel for both MPPT methods at the same step change of duty cycle.

Please cite my paper in your work:

I. V. Banu, R. Beniugă and M. Istrate, "Comparative analysis of the perturb-and-observe and incremental conductance MPPT methods," 2013 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED TOPICS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ATEE), Bucharest, 2013, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.1109/ATEE.2013.6563483
URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6563483&isnumber=6563346

Submit an Analysis

Dataset Files

You must login with an IEEE Account to access these files. IEEE Accounts are FREE.

Sign Up now or login.

OPEN ACCESS Dataset Details

Citation Author(s):
I. V. Banu, M. Istrate
Submitted by:
Ioan Viorel Banu
Last updated:
Sun, 10/22/2017 - 08:21
DOI:
10.21227/H2JD0F
Data Format:
Links:
 
Cite

Subscribe

[1] I. V. Banu, M. Istrate, "Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods", IEEE Dataport, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/H2JD0F. Accessed: Nov. 24, 2017.
@data{h2jd0f-17,
doi = {10.21227/H2JD0F},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/H2JD0F},
author = {I. V. Banu; M. Istrate },
publisher = {IEEE Dataport},
title = {Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods},
year = {2017} }
TY - DATA
T1 - Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods
AU - I. V. Banu; M. Istrate
PY - 2017
PB - IEEE Dataport
UR - 10.21227/H2JD0F
ER -
I. V. Banu, M. Istrate. (2017). Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods. IEEE Dataport. http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/H2JD0F
I. V. Banu, M. Istrate, 2017. Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/H2JD0F.
I. V. Banu, M. Istrate. (2017). "Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods." Web.
1. I. V. Banu, M. Istrate. Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods [Internet]. IEEE Dataport; 2017. Available from : http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/H2JD0F
I. V. Banu, M. Istrate. "Comparative Analysis of the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods." doi: 10.21227/H2JD0F